Publication Date: January 1, 2008
Reference: Journal of Applied Engineering in Agriculture (2008) Vol. 24(2): 245-249
Country: USA
Summary:
Download PDF »
Construction and operating costs for two gestation housing systems were compared to assess their impact on cost
per weaned pig produced. The systems compared were: 1) individual gestation stalls in a mechanically ventilated confinement building with slatted floor and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep‐bedded naturally ventilated hoop barns. It was found that in the upper Midwest United States, group housing of gestation sows in deep‐bedded hoop barns may produce pigs at a lower cost than individual gestation stalls in confinement facilities if the bedded group housing system is managed optimally.









You must be logged in to post a comment.