{"id":1052,"date":"1990-01-01T01:01:01","date_gmt":"1990-01-01T01:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/export.maxmaziy.php.nixsolutions.com\/?p=1052"},"modified":"1990-01-01T01:01:01","modified_gmt":"1990-01-01T01:01:01","slug":"airborne-microbial-contents-in-two-types-of-swine-confinement-buildings-in-quebec","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/airborne-microbial-contents-in-two-types-of-swine-confinement-buildings-in-quebec\/","title":{"rendered":"Airborne microbial contents in two types of swine confinement buildings in Quebec."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Two farrowing units housed 400 pigs each, and two fattening units housed 800 and 400, respectively; temperatures were controlled and the relative humidity was similar in each unit. Six-stage samplers collected microorganisms every 2 weeks for 6 visits from January to April; 4 and 20 minutes, respectively, were optimum for the total fraction and respirable fraction. The average airflow in the samplers was 28.3 litres\/minute at 1 m above ground in the central aisle. The flow rate for dust sampling by filters was 2 m\/minute for 1 hour. The total bacterial count was higher in the fattening houses. Averages of 48%, 15%, 52% and 19%, respectively, of total bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, fungi and yeasts of the farrowing units were in the respirable size range of < 5A\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two farrowing units housed 400 pigs each, and two fattening units housed 800 and 400, respectively; temperatures were controlled and the relative humidity was similar in each unit. Six-stage samplers collected microorganisms every 2 weeks for 6 visits from January to April; 4 and 20 minutes, respectively, were optimum for the total fraction and respirable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[540,541,542,8882,372,543,544,12251,8860,3965,286,5886,103,2851,7904,1007,20007,1806,26132,545,14,505,33,16262,235,236,1533,35,381,20911,99,18011,10764],"class_list":["post-1052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","tag-air-microbiology","tag-airborne-infection","tag-airspora","tag-al","tag-animal-housing","tag-bacterial-diseases","tag-bacteriology","tag-born","tag-cacheydbo_wtudhgjwww-prairieswine-comairborne-porcine-circovirus-in-canadian-swine-confinement-buildings-airvorne-porcine-circovirus-in-canadian-swine-confinement-buildings","tag-content","tag-dust","tag-farrow","tag-farrowing","tag-fat","tag-fattening","tag-flow-rate","tag-gh","tag-humidity","tag-jan","tag-mycoses","tag-pig","tag-pig-housing","tag-pigs","tag-pl","tag-sample","tag-sampling","tag-size","tag-swine","tag-swine-confinement-buildings","tag-t","tag-temperature","tag-tot","tag-yeast"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}