{"id":4064,"date":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/export.maxmaziy.php.nixsolutions.com\/?p=4064"},"modified":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","modified_gmt":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","slug":"effects-of-sweeteners-on-individual-feed-intake-characteristics-and-performance-in-group-housed-weanling-pigs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/effects-of-sweeteners-on-individual-feed-intake-characteristics-and-performance-in-group-housed-weanling-pigs\/","title":{"rendered":"Effects of sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance in group-housed weanling pigs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To assess the effects of 2 high intensity<br \/>\nsodium saccharine-based sweeteners on individual<br \/>\nfeed intake characteristics and performance of grouphoused<br \/>\nweaned pigs, one hundred ninety-eight 26-d-old<br \/>\nweanling pigs were given ad libitum access to 3 dietary<br \/>\ntreatments containing: no additional sweetener (control),<br \/>\n150 mg of sweetener (Sucram C-150)\/kg, or 150<br \/>\nmg of sweetener (Sucram 3D)\/kg. At weaning, piglets<br \/>\nwere allocated to 18 pens (11 pigs\/pen) based on BW,<br \/>\nsex, and ancestry, and pens were randomly assigned to<br \/>\n3 treatments with 6 pens per treatment. The pens were<br \/>\nequipped with computerized feeding stations. During<br \/>\nthe first 12 d, pigs were offered pelleted prestarter diets<br \/>\nthat were replaced at once by pelleted starter diets<br \/>\nfor the last 7 d of the 19-d experimental period. The<br \/>\nindividual feed intake characteristics consisting of latency<br \/>\ntime (interval between weaning and first feed<br \/>\nintake), initial feed intake (intake during the first 24<br \/>\nh following the first feed intake), the number of total<br \/>\nvisits per day, and the number of visits in which feed<br \/>\nwas consumed, together with the time and the feed<br \/>\nintake per visit, were determined for all piglets. Performance<br \/>\ntraits and fecal consistency were determined<br \/>\nper pen for d 0 to 5, d 5 to 12, and d 12 to 19, as well<br \/>\nas for the total period (d 0 to 19). The initiation of feed<br \/>\nintake was not affected by the addition of high intensity<br \/>\nsweeteners to the diet. From 12 d postweaning, dietary<br \/>\nsweeteners caused the piglets to focus more on<br \/>\nfeed intake and less on exploratory behavior, as shown<br \/>\nby the increased percentage of visits with feed intake<br \/>\nin pigs fed the Sucram 3D diet compared with those<br \/>\nfed the control diet (P = 0.002). The overall daily feed<br \/>\nintake increased with time but was not affected by the<br \/>\naddition of sweeteners. Nevertheless, dietary sweeteners<br \/>\nprevented the depression of feed intake on d 8 and<br \/>\n10 postweaning (d 8, P = 0.013; d 10, P = 0.014), which<br \/>\nseemed to coincide with an improved fecal consistency<br \/>\nscore (d 5 to 12, P = 0.11; d 12 to 19, P < 0.001). However,\nthe changes in feed intake characteristics and\nfecal consistency only resulted in numerical effects on\npostweaning pig performance (ADFI, P = 0.126; ADG,\nP = 0.140). The results of the present study indicate\nthat weanling pigs need a certain period of time before\nclear effects of dietary sweeteners on individual feed\nintake characteristics and pig performance can be observed.\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To assess the effects of 2 high intensity sodium saccharine-based sweeteners on individual feed intake characteristics and performance of grouphoused weaned pigs, one hundred ninety-eight 26-d-old weanling pigs were given ad libitum access to 3 dietary treatments containing: no additional sweetener (control), 150 mg of sweetener (Sucram C-150)\/kg, or 150 mg of sweetener (Sucram 3D)\/kg. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[930],"tags":[4685,8882,13816,19216,65,19644,577,1287,25122,12581,6904,46,925,108,20007,15459,2585,63,14,126,89,33,16262,14846,10101,11701,8932,15451,20280,10230,17113,24677,24347,6765,12580,20911,26223,18011,52,3790,6244,6137,77,12903],"class_list":["post-4064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-production","tag-access","tag-al","tag-ass","tag-assess","tag-behavior","tag-dd","tag-diet","tag-diets","tag-eet","tag-effects-of-sweetener-for-swine-or-pigs","tag-fee","tag-feed","tag-feed-intake","tag-feeding","tag-gh","tag-ped","tag-pellet","tag-performance","tag-pig","tag-piglet","tag-piglets","tag-pigs","tag-pl","tag-sodium","tag-start","tag-sucram-3d","tag-sucram-3d-in-pig-diet","tag-sucram-3d-pig","tag-sucram-c150-buy","tag-sucram-in-pig-diets","tag-sucram-pigs","tag-sucram-sweetener","tag-sucramin","tag-sweetener","tag-sweetener-for-swine-or-pigs","tag-t","tag-the-effects","tag-tot","tag-treatment","tag-weaned","tag-weaned-pig","tag-weaned-pigs","tag-weaning","tag-weaning-pig"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}