{"id":4068,"date":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/export.maxmaziy.php.nixsolutions.com\/?p=4068"},"modified":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","modified_gmt":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","slug":"sow-line-differences-in-heat-stress-tolerance-expressed-in-reproductive-performance-traits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/sow-line-differences-in-heat-stress-tolerance-expressed-in-reproductive-performance-traits\/","title":{"rendered":"Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The objectives of this study were 1)<br \/>\nto investigate if there were differences in the relation<br \/>\nbetween temperature and reproductive performance<br \/>\ntraits in 2 different sow lines, a Yorkshire line producing<br \/>\nmainly in temperate climates and a Large White<br \/>\nline producing mainly in warm climates, and 2) to determine<br \/>\nthe upper critical temperature (UCT) for the<br \/>\nreproductive performance of these 2 lines. Sows are<br \/>\nexposed to heat stress when temperature exceeds the<br \/>\nUCT of the thermo-neutral zone. Data included 32,631<br \/>\nobservations on reproductive performance from 11,935<br \/>\nsows on 20 farms in Spain, collected from 2003 to 2005.<br \/>\nSows belonged to 2 different purebred sow lines, named<br \/>\nD (Yorkshire sow line, producing mainly in temperate<br \/>\nclimates) and I (Large White sow line, producing<br \/>\nmainly in warm climates). Only first insemination records<br \/>\nper parity were used and were combined with the<br \/>\nmaximum outside temperature at day of insemination.<br \/>\nUpper critical temperatures were studied for 3 reproduction<br \/>\ntraits: farrowing rate (0 or 1), litter size (range<br \/>\nfrom 1 to 25), and total number of piglets born per first<br \/>\ninsemination (combination of farrowing rate and litter<br \/>\nsize, range from 0 to 25). Data were corrected for fixed<br \/>\neffects, which included parity, service sire, and an interaction<br \/>\nbetween farm and year. Corrected data were<br \/>\nused as observations in the models to study the effect of<br \/>\noutside temperature on reproductive performance. Two<br \/>\nmodels were compared for goodness of fit: a linear regression<br \/>\nmodel and a plateau-linear model with the plateau<br \/>\nrepresenting the thermo-neutral zone and a linear<br \/>\ndecrease above that zone. Farrowing rate of I-line sows<br \/>\nwas not affected by temperature. For litter size and<br \/>\ntotal number born per first insemination of I-line sows<br \/>\nno UCT could be estimated. These traits were linearly<br \/>\naffected by temperature. For all 3 reproduction traits of<br \/>\nthe D-line the best model was the plateau-linear model;<br \/>\nthe UCT for the D-line sows was estimated to be 19.2\u00b0C<br \/>\nfor farrowing rate, 21.7\u00b0C for litter size, and 19.6\u00b0C for<br \/>\ntotal number born per first insemination. The decrease<br \/>\nin reproductive performance of I-line sows with increasing<br \/>\noutside temperature was less than in D-line sows.<br \/>\nFrom this study it can be concluded that there are<br \/>\ndifferences in heat stress tolerance between sow lines<br \/>\nas measured by the differences in reproductive performance.<br \/>\nThese differences are an indication of genetic<br \/>\ndifferences in heat stress tolerance in sow lines.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The objectives of this study were 1) to investigate if there were differences in the relation between temperature and reproductive performance traits in 2 different sow lines, a Yorkshire line producing mainly in temperate climates and a Large White line producing mainly in warm climates, and 2) to determine the upper critical temperature (UCT) for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[930],"tags":[8882,2854,12251,562,5886,103,7846,3804,269,2318,5620,818,1318,10859,14784,63,14,126,89,16262,17743,27282,5177,4199,12242,1533,104,6774,96,110,20911,99,18011,6775,4176],"class_list":["post-4068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-production","tag-al","tag-bin","tag-born","tag-farms","tag-farrow","tag-farrowing","tag-farrowing-rate","tag-genetic","tag-heat","tag-heat-stress","tag-insemination","tag-litter","tag-litter-size","tag-nat","tag-ness","tag-performance","tag-pig","tag-piglet","tag-piglets","tag-pl","tag-prod","tag-production","tag-purebred","tag-reproductive-performance","tag-service","tag-size","tag-sow","tag-sow-line","tag-sows","tag-stress","tag-t","tag-temperature","tag-tot","tag-upper-critical-temperature","tag-yorkshire"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4068"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4068\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}