{"id":4818,"date":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/export.maxmaziy.php.nixsolutions.com\/?p=4818"},"modified":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","modified_gmt":"2008-01-01T01:01:01","slug":"carcass-meat-quality-and-sensory-characteristics-of-heavy-body-weight-pigs-fed-ractopamine-hydrochloride-paylean","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/carcass-meat-quality-and-sensory-characteristics-of-heavy-body-weight-pigs-fed-ractopamine-hydrochloride-paylean\/","title":{"rendered":"Carcass, meat quality, and sensory characteristics of heavy body weight pigs fed ractopamine hydrochloride (Paylean)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Carcass characteristics, meat quality<br \/>\ntraits, and sensory attributes were evaluated in latefinishing<br \/>\nbarrows and gilts, weighing between 100 to<br \/>\n130 kg of BW, fed 0, 5, or 7.4 mg\/kg of ractopamine<br \/>\nhydrochloride (RAC) for the final 21 to 28 d before<br \/>\nslaughter. Carcass data were collected from carcasses<br \/>\nfrom barrows and gilts (n = 168), and all primal cuts<br \/>\nfrom the right sides of these carcasses were fabricated<br \/>\nto calculate primal yields as a percentage of the HCW.<br \/>\nSubjective (National Pork Producers Council and Japanese)<br \/>\ncolor, firmness, and marbling scores were determined<br \/>\non the LM of each loin and the semimembranosus<br \/>\nmuscle (SM) of the ham, whereas the moisture,<br \/>\nextractable lipid, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF),<br \/>\nand trained sensory evaluations (juiciness, tenderness,<br \/>\nand pork flavor) were measured on the LM samples<br \/>\nonly. Gilts produced heavier (P < 0.05) HCW than barrows,\nwhereas feeding RAC increased (P < 0.05) HCW\nover pigs fed diets devoid of RAC. Carcasses from gilts\nalso had greater (P < 0.02) primal cut and lean cut (P\n< 0.01) yields than barrows, and dietary inclusion of 5\nmg\/kg of RAC increased (P < 0.05) total boneless cut\nand lean cut yields when compared with carcass from\npigs fed 0 or 7.4 mg\/kg of RAC. Warner-Bratzler shear\nforces values were greater (P < 0.05) in the LM of gilts\nthan barrows, but only juiciness scores were greater\n(P < 0.03) in LM chops from barrows than gilts. The\nLM from barrows had greater intramuscular lipid (P\n< 0.001) than the LM from gilts, and even though the\nLM from pigs fed 5 mg\/kg of RAC had greater (P <\n0.04) WBSF values than the LM from pigs fed 0 or\n7.4 mg\/kg of RAC, including RAC in the late-finishing\ndiets for 21 or 28 d did not affect sensory panel rating\nor percentages of moisture and intramuscular lipid. In\nsummary, addition of RAC in the late-finishing diet\nimproved carcass and primal cut yields when it was fed\nat 5 and 7.4 mg\/kg without altering pork quality traits\nregardless of whether RAC was fed for 21 or 28 d.\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Carcass characteristics, meat quality traits, and sensory attributes were evaluated in latefinishing barrows and gilts, weighing between 100 to 130 kg of BW, fed 0, 5, or 7.4 mg\/kg of ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) for the final 21 to 28 d before slaughter. Carcass data were collected from carcasses from barrows and gilts (n = 168), [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2102],"tags":[8882,10033,13816,7321,5117,6973,14847,6988,19644,577,1287,6904,46,108,124,20007,105,3322,16714,2878,6990,94,27284,10859,14784,13840,4258,14,33,16262,1324,17152,183,17743,95,3871,26796,76,20911,18011,6853,1301,2285],"class_list":["post-4818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-meat-quality","tag-al","tag-arc","tag-ass","tag-barrows","tag-body-weight","tag-carcass-trait","tag-chloride","tag-color","tag-dd","tag-diet","tag-diets","tag-fee","tag-feed","tag-feeding","tag-finishing","tag-gh","tag-gilt","tag-gilts","tag-heavy-carcasses-pork-meat-quality","tag-japan","tag-late-finishing-pig","tag-meat","tag-meat-quality","tag-nat","tag-ness","tag-organoleptic-effects-of-ractopamine-in-meat","tag-paylean","tag-pig","tag-pigs","tag-pl","tag-pork","tag-pork-producers","tag-pork-quality","tag-prod","tag-quality","tag-ractopamine","tag-shea","tag-slaughter","tag-t","tag-tot","tag-weighing","tag-weight","tag-yield"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4818"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4818\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prairieswine.com\/rsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}