Production

 Industry Partners


Prairie Swine Centre is an affiliate of the University of Saskatchewan


Prairie Swine Centre is grateful for the assistance of the George Morris Centre in developing the economics portion of Pork Insight.

Financial support for the Enterprise Model Project and Pork Insight has been provided by:



Pig Processing and General Pain Management

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on June 5, 2017 | No Comments

This discussion outlined a variety of subjects related to pain control from processing to farrowing and different studies tied to each procedure. Conclusions were mixed.

Pig-Processing-General-Pain-Management-Robert-Friendship

The “Smart Pig Handling” Videos

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

Points arising from the “Smart Pig Handling” videos
Slow is faster than stopped. Most of the things that cost extra time: pigs stopping, baulking, piling, bunching, wedging, circling back… can be avoided simply by backing off and letting pigs move at their own speed. Reduce rushing to reduce the time required.

Nancy-Lidste-Smart-Anima-Handling-Videos-Key-Concepts

Post weaning disease control

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

The long cold Canadian winters present some unique challenges in pig production. Keeping animals warm in the winter, temperature fluctuations and ventilation issues. The former is a challenge to newly weaned pigs in particular and the latter, or lack of it brings on problems with respiratory and systemic infections.

Necropsies of typical cases give you a good overview of what is going on. Samples can be taken and sent away for testing, these all add up to the overall picture and diagnosis and what may be the best method of control.

 

Behind the numbers of finishing barn managment

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

4 Key Points are made for successful finishing:

  1. Develop checklists for both the barn operator and the fieldsman.
    • This allows you to monitor repeatable incidents and develop individual profiles
  2. Keep and maintain a database of everything going on
    • Monitor each system as this will allow for specific changes to be made which will positively influence productivity
  3. Develop a benchmark group that is monitored by a third party
  4. Health and biosecurity.

 

Antimicrobial resistance, Myths and realities

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

By analysis of the transmission of infections to man it can be shown that direct transmission of infections and resistance from pigs to pig farmers/workers of such bacteria as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Streptococcus suis are relatively high at 83% and 21% respectively. Indirect transmission  via meat appears to be a much smaller risk from pigs to human population, this transmission is often overestimated.

MANAGEMENT OF REPLACEMENT GILTS

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on May 12, 2017 | No Comments

Replacement gilts represent about 20% of all farrowings on most farms. As such, they are a critical part of the production system, though in many operations all females in the breeding herd are treated similarly. Gilts intended to be used as replacements should be treated as the special animals that they are. After all genetic decisions are made, they should be provided a better nursing environment, more space and separate feeds than their counterparts intended for market. Health should be monitored and actively managed. Through the strategic use of mature boars, the gilt age at puberty should be stimulated early and recorded. They should be mated and managed after mating as parity one females, receiving a different diet than older sows. These steps require extra time, and in some cases greater investment, but the payoff in long term productivity can be great.

STALE GILTS: Assuming that other conditions are normal (i.e. body condition, health etc.) treating these animals like gilts that failed to express puberty (i.e. acute stress or PG-600TM) seems to result in significant re-initiation of normal, fertile estrous cycles. In these gilts reproductive performance is expected to be normal.

GILT DEVELOPMENT AND LONGEVITY

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

The data suggest a split on the impact of fast gilt growth rate on reduced longevity. Based on the large data sets and variety of farms and genetics included, it is more likely that as long as gilts are within a desired range for growth, puberty and even longevity may not be the issue. However, both fertility and longevity can be influenced by gilt parameters at time of breeding which would have consequences for gestation and lactation performance. The data also strongly suggest that very low growth rates (<500 g/d) are less likely arise in modern production systems today. These gilts would be far below weight and should not be selected for the gilt pool. Farms that do observe problems with excessive body condition as a result of fast growth rates, can choose to limit feed access or change diet as long as restriction of energy is not below 75% of ad libitum, and protein is not limiting. Several studies implicate age at first farrowing, first litter size, and litter weaning weight as key measures for gilt longevity. First litter production is an important milestone for gilts and relies on breeding decisions and management of the female. The factors involved in litter production include gilt fertility at estrus, her ovulation rate, fertilization rate, embryo survival and uterine capacity. Some of these processes are complex, and therefore farms should focus on what can be assessed and controlled by management. The considerable body of evidence implicating troublesome variation in estrus expression suggests problems in how farms deal with this problem and how estrus expression is performed in gilts. The genetic and seasonal effects on estrus symptoms also suggest that more stringent culling could be helpful. However, industry data indicates high performance is possible and not infrequent for early age at puberty and gilt puberty induction. Problems then appear to be further downstream when gilts fail to farrow early in their lifetime, when they produce a small litter in the first farrowing, or when they wean a light litter in their first parity.

SOLUTIONS TO PRODUCTIVITY CHALLENGES – Allister Scorgie

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

There can be a number of challenges to productivity on the sow farm including: labour, nutrition, genetics, health, facilities, environment, gilt management, etc. The biggest factor affecting productivity is the number of pigs weaned.  The number of sows farrowing has the biggest impact on the number of pigs weaned. The number of sows farrowing is in turn impacted the most by the number of gilts farrowing and management of the Gilt Developer Unit (GDU).  How can pre-weaning survival be enhanced and what factors influence weaning weight variation of pigs?

Gilts need ad lib feeding from 90 days of age to puberty to have proper mammary development. Also, nutrition in the last third of gestation affects mammary development. A lean gilt at farrowing will produce an average of 28% more milk per day than a fat gilt.

As litter size has increased there are more challenges for piglet survivability. There are more light weight pigs born, resulting in more of a spread in weaning weights. Producers and farrowing room staff can adopt a number of practices such as split suckling and cross fostering to improve piglet survivability and weaning weights. Producers can train staff so that sows are properly supervised at farrowing and piglets are properly cared for. Sharing information with staff will help keep them motivated and focused. Improvement in biosecurity are helping producers keep major diseases out.

SOLUTIONS TO PRODUCTIVITY CHALLENGES

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

Enhancing reproductive performance of the breeding herd is a daily challenge. Today’s sows and gilts are expected to farrow and wean a large number of pigs per litter and have a large accumulated number of pigs weaned per sow per year. Caretakers need to continuously be alert and look for major and minor problems that can affect reproductive performance. Although numerous factors can influence reproductive performance, this paper only deals with some of the factors affecting preweaning survival and growth rate, such as: managing colostrum intake, effect of colostrum intake on growth rate, managing mammary gland development, identification and management of non-functional mammary glands, effect of litter size on growth rate, and use of creep feed to improve the adaptation of weaned pigs to solid feed.

In general terms, piglets that died before weaning have difficulty taking their first breath after birth, lower birth weight, lower colostrum intake, lower weight gain during the first 24 hours after birth, lower rectal temperature, higher plasma cortisol concentration, lower plasma IgG and glucose concentrations at 24 hours after birth than piglets still alive at weaning. Numerous factors influence the amount of colostrum available per piglet, such as: 1) a short period of time (24 hours) when colostrum is available; 2) competition among piglets due to differences in body size, vitality, and number of piglets per litter; 3) the effect of birth order on amount of time available for piglets to consume colostrum; 4) colostrum is more abundantly secreted in the early phase of the colostrum period; 5) colostrum composition changes dramatically within the colostrum period, and (6) missing nursing bouts during first 24 hours of life. It is absolutely essential that ALL piglets receive their fair share of colostrum to enhance their chance for survival. The production of colostrum does not increase with litter size. Individual colostrum intake during the first 24 h after birth averages 250-300 g/d.

PRACTICAL LOOSE SOW MANAGEMENT

Posted in: Pork Insight Articles, Production by admin on | No Comments

You have static group and dynamic groups with sows. It seems that dynamic groups is becoming the favourite one, especially if sows are introduced in the group housing directly after insemination.

The decision to use dynamic groups is based on the size of the farm. With 500 sows in 20 week groups you end up with 25 sows per group and that number does not fully utilize your feed stations. One other consideration used in the decision to use dynamic groups is that the space requirement is 10 percent lower in large groups than it is in groups less than 40 sows.

The four feeding stations in the large group sit next to each other which is a standard configuration used in dynamic groups by Nedap. All activities are concentrated in small areas and the remainder of the barn is very quiet. There is very little competition at the entrance to the stations as there is always an alternate station within a short walk away. There are 50-55 sows per feed station which Druijff considers the maximum number to be effective. This situation also contributes to the peace and quiet in the pen and allows the lesser sows to have sufficient time to eat as well.

One advantage to feed stations sitting in a row is that share a joint exit leading to a separation unit. This is more efficient than each station having its own separation unit.

 
Slots Master There is no definite strategy or technique that you can use as you play slots